Category Archives: Uncategorized

Klarman: Understanding How Our Brains Work Is One Of The Keys To Successful Investing

Seth Klarman’s Baupost Group recently released their latest shareholder’s letter. It’s a long one at 31 pages, but it’s full of introspective analysis on why Klarman thinks he and Baupost Group have been successful. The reasons include maintaining a long-term perspective, maintaining a sufficient margin of safety, and analyzing investor psychology. Nothing groundbreaking, but it’s always useful to peer in the mind of a great investor.

To my surprise, Klarman spends a significant portion of the letter discussing the work of Nobel Prize winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman and the various mental models and cognitive biases that have been developed from Kahneman’s resarch:

Understanding how our brains work–our limitations, endless mental shortcuts, and deeply ingrained biases–is one of the keys to successful investing. A Baupost, we believe that it is sometimes easier to predict how investors will behave in certain situations than it is to predict a company’s bottom line. At times of market extremes, by avoiding emotional overreaction and remaining aware of our biases, it may be possible to know market participants better than they can know themselves.

How can we improve our thinking? Kahneman, notes that the voice of reason (System Two) may be much fainter than the loud and clear voice of an erroneous intuition (System One). Questioning your assumptions is unpleasant when you face the stress of a big decision; more doubt is the last thing you want when you are in trouble. We would all like to have a warning bell that rings when we are about to make a serious error, but no such bell is available. It turns out that it is much easier to identify a minefield when you observe others wandering into it than when you are about to do so yourself. Observers are less cognitively busy and more open to information than actors.

Investing lies at the intersection of economics and psychology, the place where net present value meets greed and fear. It is important to know the numbers—but that is not sufficient. And it is important to know how people think-but that, too, is not enough. Both matter; it is, of course, good to buy investment bargains, but it is far better if you know why they are bargain-priced. Kahneman helps us understand some of the reasons why markets can be inefficient and thus why bargains exist.

Other things that casual observers may not know is that Baupost Group regularly maintains a large percentage of its portfolio in cash (on average, around 33 percent of NAV and sometimes up to 50 percent!) and may take up to a year in deciding whether an investment is worthwhile.

Download the full letter here.

The Curated List Of Finance

Some curated links that I have collected over time. I hope this can be of some use for other people, and I welcome contributions to the list.

Quotes
(1) Yahoo! Finance
(2) Google Finance
(3) Finviz

 News
(1) Bloomberg
(2) The Wall Street Journal
(3) The New York Times
(4) CNBC
(5) Financial Times
(6) The Economist
(7) Reuters
(8) Business Insider
(9) Forbes
(10) Google News – Business
(11) The Atlantic – Business
(12) Seeking Alpha

Education
(1) Investopedia

SEC Filings
(1) SEC EDGAR

Blogs
(1) Zero Hedge
(2) FT Alphaville
(3) Dealbreaker
(4) The Big Picture
(5) Dealbook

Charting
(1) StockCharts.com

Forums
(1) Elite Trader
(2) Wilmott
(3) Nuclear Phynance
(4) /r/finance, /r/investing, /r/securityanalysis, r/traders

Brokers
(1) E*Trade
(2) TD Ameritrade
(3) Interactive Brokers

Today’s Market Crash Broke Google Finance

What Seperates the Top 0.5% From The Bottom 99.5%?

Everyone pretty much knows that wealth is concentrated at the top, but what may be hard to visualize is just how concentrated it can be. Take a look at the top 1%, for example. There is a dramatic difference in the level of wealth in this one percentage point, and a dramatic shift between the top half and bottom half of this 1%.

An investment manager that works with high net worth clients actually makes the case that it’s relatively easy for a well educated and hard working family to enter the 1%. But it becomes extremely difficult to break into the top half of that 1% — the 99.5% percentile.

Also, it’s extremely surprising that the bottom half of the top 1% live pretty much like everyone else. In other words, they still aren’t free from financial worries:

Until recently, most studies just broke out the top 1% as a group. Data on net worth distributions within the top 1% indicate that one enters the top 0.5% with about $1.8M, the top 0.25% with $3.1M, the top 0.10% with $5.5M and the top 0.01% with $24.4M. Wealth distribution is highly skewed towards the top 0.01%, increasing the overall average for this group. The net worth for those in the lower half of the top 1% is usually achieved after decades of education, hard work, saving and investing as a professional or small business person. While an after-tax income of $175k to $250k and net worth in the $1.2M to $1.8M range may seem like a lot of money to most Americans, it doesn’t really buy freedom from financial worry or access to the true corridors of power and money. That doesn’t become frequent until we reach the top 0.1%.

What this investment manager has seen has led him to believe that one needs some sort of connection to the financial services industry to get into the top 0.5%:

Folks in the top 0.1% come from many backgrounds but it’s infrequent to meet one whose wealth wasn’t acquired through direct or indirect participation in the financial and banking industries. One of our clients, net worth in the $60M range, built a small company and was acquired with stock from a multi-national. Stock is often called a “paper” asset. Another client, CEO of a medium-cap tech company, retired with a net worth in the $70M range. The bulk of any CEO’s wealth comes from stock, not income, and incomes are also very high. Last year, the average S&P 500 CEO made $9M in all forms of compensation. One client runs a division of a major international investment bank, net worth in the $30M range and most of the profits from his division flow directly or indirectly from the public sector, the taxpayer. Another client with a net worth in the $10M range is the ex-wife of a managing director of a major investment bank, while another was able to amass $12M after taxes by her early thirties from stock options as a high level programmer in a successful IT company. The picture is clear; entry into the top 0.5% and, particularly, the top 0.1% is usually the result of some association with the financial industry and its creations. I find it questionable as to whether the majority in this group actually adds value or simply diverts value from the US economy and business into its pockets and the pockets of the uber-wealthy who hire them. They are, of course, doing nothing illegal.

Read the full article here. If you enjoyed this post, follow Curated Alpha via Email, RSS, or Twitter .

CEO of Las Vegas Sands Views Wall Street Analysts That Follow His Company As Small Children

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) which operates the Venetian in Las Vegas, the Venetian Macau, and Marina Bay Sands in Singapore has some of the most entertaining conference calls that I’ve read.

Usually, conference calls are supposed to be extremely formal, mainly because executives can get in a lot of trouble if they make any remarks that mislead investors. Lawyers refer to these as material misstatements or omissions (think Enron).

I recently made a small purchase in Las Vegas Sands (LVS) after reading several of their conference calls and the most recent 10-K. LVS is more or less an Asian company now, with the majority of their earnings and future growth coming from their properties in Macau and Singapore. I think this protects LVS from a lot of the negative things that are happening in the United States and Europe.

Here are some of the highlights of the call.

Sheldon makes sure that analysts are listening for dramatic effect — I love the arrogance of Sheldon Adelson in this portion. Readers need to listen to the audio of the conference call for the full effect:

Let me now give some commentary on our specific property operations. I’ll start in Singapore, where Marina Bay Sands recorded a whopping $405 million in adjusted property EBITDA. While I believe the ramp-up process is still ongoing in Singapore, Marina Bay Sands generated net revenue of $738 million and an EBITDA margin — are you listening? — 55%. Just want to make sure you heard it.

Adelson brings up the 55% EBITDA margin again in response to a question about Singapore’s future growth:

Sheldon Adelson: We know, but we can’t say. But what I want to say is that when you think about the possibility, Singapore’s only been opened for a little more than a year, both properties. And to think that we’ve saturated the entire market of like 3 billion people within the market radius is not credible thought. There’s no way that we’ve saturated the market, just no way. And the more that people get to learn by word of mouth that Singapore is the place to go, we don’t have to tell them Singapore’s the place to go, but it’s now the place to go to gamble. It’s the place to go for tourism. It’s the place to go for conventions. And Singapore is now no longer known as a stuffy, conservative place. Nobody’s making jokes about chewing gum. But everybody’s talking about what great restaurants there are, what a good time you can have when you go to Singapore, what a great destination it is for both FIT and convention. And I don’t see — there’s nobody who can convince me that we’ve even touched the area of saturation of the market. I think Singapore is going to continue to grow and grow and grow. By the way, Robin, did you hear the 55% number?

Robin Farley – UBS Investment Bank: I heard. I noticed that, yes.

And some entertaining banter in the closing remarks:

Sheldon Adelson: Well, we got to adjust that budget because we have to send out our towels. We’re afraid of our towels that we sent out to people who get egg on their face because they run projections. We got to send them out to almost every analyst in the street. Ken, can we fit that in the budget?

Robert Goldstein: We’ve got plenty left over.

Sheldon Adelson: And if you need changes in billion [ph], give my wife a call.

Conference calls are usually pretty dry, but I quite enjoyed listening to this one, but this comes no where close to topping the impersonator who somehow managed to get on conference calls and ask random questions to CEOs of companies.

Returning to the topic at hand, I strongly recommend investors to listen to the conference calls of companies that they follow. Seeking Alpha is the best source out there for free conference call transcripts for most companies.