Monthly Archives: February 2012

Klarman: Understanding How Our Brains Work Is One Of The Keys To Successful Investing

Seth Klarman’s Baupost Group recently released their latest shareholder’s letter. It’s a long one at 31 pages, but it’s full of introspective analysis on why Klarman thinks he and Baupost Group have been successful. The reasons include maintaining a long-term perspective, maintaining a sufficient margin of safety, and analyzing investor psychology. Nothing groundbreaking, but it’s always useful to peer in the mind of a great investor.

To my surprise, Klarman spends a significant portion of the letter discussing the work of Nobel Prize winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman and the various mental models and cognitive biases that have been developed from Kahneman’s resarch:

Understanding how our brains work–our limitations, endless mental shortcuts, and deeply ingrained biases–is one of the keys to successful investing. A Baupost, we believe that it is sometimes easier to predict how investors will behave in certain situations than it is to predict a company’s bottom line. At times of market extremes, by avoiding emotional overreaction and remaining aware of our biases, it may be possible to know market participants better than they can know themselves.

How can we improve our thinking? Kahneman, notes that the voice of reason (System Two) may be much fainter than the loud and clear voice of an erroneous intuition (System One). Questioning your assumptions is unpleasant when you face the stress of a big decision; more doubt is the last thing you want when you are in trouble. We would all like to have a warning bell that rings when we are about to make a serious error, but no such bell is available. It turns out that it is much easier to identify a minefield when you observe others wandering into it than when you are about to do so yourself. Observers are less cognitively busy and more open to information than actors.

Investing lies at the intersection of economics and psychology, the place where net present value meets greed and fear. It is important to know the numbers—but that is not sufficient. And it is important to know how people think-but that, too, is not enough. Both matter; it is, of course, good to buy investment bargains, but it is far better if you know why they are bargain-priced. Kahneman helps us understand some of the reasons why markets can be inefficient and thus why bargains exist.

Other things that casual observers may not know is that Baupost Group regularly maintains a large percentage of its portfolio in cash (on average, around 33 percent of NAV and sometimes up to 50 percent!) and may take up to a year in deciding whether an investment is worthwhile.

Download the full letter here.

Life After Wall Street

Continuing with my previous post on the negative health effects that a high-stress job can bring, I present to readers an excellent long-form article from The Financial Times containing  a compilation of personal stories from ex-bankers and traders:

For the past generation, Wall Street has been a black hole that sucked in the world’s best and brightest minds, lured by the irresistible prospect of obscene wealth without the risk to any personal capital. But now the first flicker of serious prosecutions against the abominable behaviour that led up to the financial crisis combined with materially smaller bonuses has cast a pall over the attractiveness of a Wall Street career. A former Goldmans banker said that for the first time in decades, a number of recent college graduates have actually turned down offers from the bank, opting instead for the much more altruistic Teach for America.

Continue reading here.

Health of Investment Bankers

During their first two years, the bankers worked on average 80 to 120 hours a week, but remained eager and energetic, she says. They typically arrived at 6 a.m. and left around midnight.

By the fourth year, however, many bankers were a mess, according to the study. Some were sleep-deprived, blaming their bodies for preventing them from finishing their work. Others developed allergies and substance addictions. Still others were diagnosed with long-term health conditions such as Crohn’s disease, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and thyroid disorders.

One mild-mannered banking associate spoke about exploding in rage at a cab driver after unsuccessfully attempting to open a locked door from the outside: “I became so furious that I kept banging against the windows like crazy, swearing at the poor guy. And then I turned around and saw that a managing director was watching with his mouth open. I was so ashamed.”

Meanwhile, company “perks” offered to employees, such as take-out meals and car service, had gradually blurred the lines between work and life.

One vice president described work as a never-ending nightmare, waking up every morning and wishing the day before “was just a bad dream.” Another vice president said he was so worried others might notice his drinking problem that he would “keep losing half of what they are saying.”

By the sixth year, the participants, now in their mid-30s, had split into two camps: the 60% who remained “at war” with their bodies, and the remaining 40% who decided to prioritize their health, meaning they paid more attention to sleep, exercise and diet and set limits on how much they allowed work to consume them.

Continue reading here.

Warren Buffet on Gold

Today the world’s gold stock is about 170,000 metric tons. If all of this gold were melded together, it would form a cube of about 68 feet per side. (Picture it fitting comfortably within a baseball infield.) At $1,750 per ounce — gold’s price as I write this — its value would be about $9.6 trillion. Call this cube pile A.

Let’s now create a pile B costing an equal amount. For that, we could buy all U.S. cropland (400 million acres with output of about $200 billion annually), plus 16 Exxon Mobils (the world’s most profitable company, one earning more than $40 billion annually). After these purchases, we would have about $1 trillion left over for walking-around money (no sense feeling strapped after this buying binge). Can you imagine an investor with $9.6 trillion selecting pile A over pile B?

Beyond the staggering valuation given the existing stock of gold, current prices make today’s annual production of gold command about $160 billion. Buyers — whether jewelry and industrial users, frightened individuals, or speculators — must continually absorb this additional supply to merely maintain an equilibrium at present prices.

A century from now the 400 million acres of farmland will have produced staggering amounts of corn, wheat, cotton, and other crops — and will continue to produce that valuable bounty, whatever the currency may be. Exxon Mobil (XOM) will probably have delivered trillions of dollars in dividends to its owners and will also hold assets worth many more trillions (and, remember, you get 16 Exxons). The 170,000 tons of gold will be unchanged in size and still incapable of producing anything. You can fondle the cube, but it will not respond.

Admittedly, when people a century from now are fearful, it’s likely many will still rush to gold. I’m confident, however, that the $9.6 trillion current valuation of pile A will compound over the century at a rate far inferior to that achieved by pile B.

Continue reading here.

The End Of Wall Street

On Wall Street, the misery index is as high as it’s been since brokers were on window ledges back in 1929. But sentiments like that, accompanied by a full orchestra of the world’s tiniest violins, are only part of the conversation in Wall Street offices and trading desks. Along with the complaint is something that might be called soul-searching—which is, in itself, a surprising development. Since the crash, and especially since the occupation of Zuccotti Park last September (which does appear to have rattled a lot of nerves), there has been a growing recognition on Wall Street that the system that had provided those million-dollar bonuses was built on a highly unstable foundation. Disagreeable as it may be, goes this thinking, bankers have to go back to first principles, assess their value in the economy, and take their part in its rebuilding. No one on Wall Street liked to be scapegoated either by the Obama administration or by the Occupiers. But many acknowledge that the bubble­-bust-bubble seesaw of the past decades isn’t the natural order of capitalism—and that the compensation arrangements just may have been a bit out of whack. “There’s no other industry where you could get paid so much for doing so little,” a former Lehman trader said. Paul Volcker, whose eponymous rule is at the core of the changes, echoes an idea that more bankers than you’d think would agree with. “Finance became a self-justification,” he told me recently. “They made a lot of money trading with each other with doubtful public benefit.”

Excellent long-form article from New York Magazine which highlights the current regulatory environment that financial institutions operate under. Continue reading here. Readers may also be interested in the Glass-Stegall Act, Dodd-Frank Act, and Volcker Rule, all of which are mentioned in the article.