Everyone pretty much knows that wealth is concentrated at the top, but what may be hard to visualize is just how concentrated it can be. Take a look at the top 1%, for example. There is a dramatic difference in the level of wealth in this one percentage point, and a dramatic shift between the top half and bottom half of this 1%.
An investment manager that works with high net worth clients actually makes the case that it’s relatively easy for a well educated and hard working family to enter the 1%. But it becomes extremely difficult to break into the top half of that 1% — the 99.5% percentile.
Also, it’s extremely surprising that the bottom half of the top 1% live pretty much like everyone else. In other words, they still aren’t free from financial worries:
Until recently, most studies just broke out the top 1% as a group. Data on net worth distributions within the top 1% indicate that one enters the top 0.5% with about $1.8M, the top 0.25% with $3.1M, the top 0.10% with $5.5M and the top 0.01% with $24.4M. Wealth distribution is highly skewed towards the top 0.01%, increasing the overall average for this group. The net worth for those in the lower half of the top 1% is usually achieved after decades of education, hard work, saving and investing as a professional or small business person. While an after-tax income of $175k to $250k and net worth in the $1.2M to $1.8M range may seem like a lot of money to most Americans, it doesn’t really buy freedom from financial worry or access to the true corridors of power and money. That doesn’t become frequent until we reach the top 0.1%.
What this investment manager has seen has led him to believe that one needs some sort of connection to the financial services industry to get into the top 0.5%:
Folks in the top 0.1% come from many backgrounds but it’s infrequent to meet one whose wealth wasn’t acquired through direct or indirect participation in the financial and banking industries. One of our clients, net worth in the $60M range, built a small company and was acquired with stock from a multi-national. Stock is often called a “paper” asset. Another client, CEO of a medium-cap tech company, retired with a net worth in the $70M range. The bulk of any CEO’s wealth comes from stock, not income, and incomes are also very high. Last year, the average S&P 500 CEO made $9M in all forms of compensation. One client runs a division of a major international investment bank, net worth in the $30M range and most of the profits from his division flow directly or indirectly from the public sector, the taxpayer. Another client with a net worth in the $10M range is the ex-wife of a managing director of a major investment bank, while another was able to amass $12M after taxes by her early thirties from stock options as a high level programmer in a successful IT company. The picture is clear; entry into the top 0.5% and, particularly, the top 0.1% is usually the result of some association with the financial industry and its creations. I find it questionable as to whether the majority in this group actually adds value or simply diverts value from the US economy and business into its pockets and the pockets of the uber-wealthy who hire them. They are, of course, doing nothing illegal.
Read the full article here. If you enjoyed this post, follow Curated Alpha via Email, RSS, or Twitter .
Related posts:
Pingback: income inequality - Page 73 - Christian Forums